Ciso Review
/cs:ciso-review <plan> — Risk-paranoid interrogation of any plan that touches data, compliance, or production access.
Install
Quick install
npx skills add https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/tree/main/c-level-advisor/c-level-agents/skills/ciso-reviewnpx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill ciso-review --agent claude-codenpx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill ciso-review --agent cursornpx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill ciso-review --agent codexnpx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill ciso-review --agent opencodenpx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill ciso-review --agent github-copilotnpx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill ciso-review --agent windsurfMore install options
Shorthand — useful for multi-skill repos:
npx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill ciso-reviewManual — clone the repo and drop the folder into your agent's skills directory:
git clone https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills.gitcp -r claude-skills/c-level-advisor/c-level-agents/skills/ciso-review ~/.claude/skills//cs:ciso-review — CISO Forcing Questions
Command: /cs:ciso-review <plan>
The risk-paranoid threat-modeler. Six questions before any production change that touches customer data or compliance scope.
When to Run
- Before deploying any system that touches PII / PHI / cardholder data
- Before signing a new vendor with data access
- Before a compliance audit (SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR)
- Before any architecture decision crossing trust boundaries
- After any near-miss incident
The Six CISO Questions
1. Threat Model
What's the STRIDE threat model for this system, and which threat is most likely?- Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Info Disclosure, DoS, Elevation of Privilege.
- Pick the top 3 by likelihood × impact.
2. Blast Radius
If this is fully compromised, what data is exposed and how many users are affected?- Worst case in plain English.
- Quantify in dollars via FAIR-based ALE.
3. Detection
What signals indicate compromise, and how long until they're triggered (MTTD)?- Logs alone are not detection.
- Define the detection rule, the alert, and the on-call.
4. Response
Is there an IR runbook for this scenario, and has it been tabletop-tested?- If no runbook: build one before ship.
- If untested: tabletop before ship.
5. Regulatory Window
What's the regulator notification window if this scenario occurs?- GDPR: 72h. HIPAA: 60d. State breach laws vary.
- Pre-write the customer comms template.
6. Vendor & Supply Chain
Which third-party vendors are in scope, and what's their security posture?- Subprocessor list current?
- DPAs in place?
- Last security review per vendor?
Workflow
python ../../../skills/ciso-advisor/scripts/risk_quantifier.py
python ../../../skills/ciso-advisor/scripts/compliance_tracker.py
Output Format
# CISO Review: <plan>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
## Threat Model
- Top threat: <STRIDE category> — <description>
- Likelihood: H/M/L | Impact: H/M/L
- ALE: $X / year
## Blast Radius
- Data exposed (worst case): <description>
- Users affected: N
- Estimated cost: $X
## Detection
- MTTD target: X hours
- Current MTTD: X hours
- Detection rule: <name>
## Response
- IR runbook: ✅ / ❌
- Last tabletop: <date>
## Regulatory
- Frameworks in scope: SOC 2 / ISO 27001 / HIPAA / GDPR
- Notification window: X hours/days
## Vendors
- New vendors added: N
- DPAs signed: N / N
- Security reviews complete: N / N
## Verdict
🟢 SHIP | 🟡 MITIGATE THEN SHIP | 🔴 BLOCK
Routing
/cs:cto-review— architecture alignment/cs:gc-review— DPA, regulatory implications/cs:decide— log risk acceptance/cs:boardroom— for CRITICAL risks
Related
- Agent: [
cs-ciso-advisor](../../agents/cs-ciso-advisor.md) - Skill: [
ciso-advisor](../../../skills/ciso-advisor/SKILL.md) - Compliance:
../../../../ra-qm-team/
---
Version: 1.0.0
SKILL.md source
--- name: ciso-review description: /cs:ciso-review <plan> — Risk-paranoid interrogation of any plan that touches data, compliance, or production access. --- # /cs:ciso-review — CISO Forcing Questions **Command:** `/cs:ciso-review <plan>` The risk-paranoid threat-modeler. Six questions before any production change that touches customer data or compliance scope. ## When to Run - Before deploying any system that touches PII / PHI / cardholder data - Before signing a new vendor with data access - Before a compliance audit (SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR) - Before any architecture decision crossing trust boundaries - After any near-miss incident ## The Six CISO Questions ### 1. Threat Model **What's the STRIDE threat model for this system, and which threat is most likely?** - Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Info Disclosure, DoS, Elevation of Privilege. - Pick the top 3 by likelihood × impact. ### 2. Blast Radius **If this is fully compromised, what data is exposed and how many users are affected?** - Worst case in plain English. - Quantify in dollars via FAIR-based ALE. ### 3. Detection **What signals indicate compromise, and how long until they're triggered (MTTD)?** - Logs alone are not detection. - Define the detection rule, the alert, and the on-call. ### 4. Response **Is there an IR runbook for this scenario, and has it been tabletop-tested?** - If no runbook: build one before ship. - If untested: tabletop before ship. ### 5. Regulatory Window **What's the regulator notification window if this scenario occurs?** - GDPR: 72h. HIPAA: 60d. State breach laws vary. - Pre-write the customer comms template. ### 6. Vendor & Supply Chain **Which third-party vendors are in scope, and what's their security posture?** - Subprocessor list current? - DPAs in place? - Last security review per vendor? ## Workflow ```bash python ../../../skills/ciso-advisor/scripts/risk_quantifier.py python ../../../skills/ciso-advisor/scripts/compliance_tracker.py ``` ## Output Format ```markdown # CISO Review: <plan> **Date:** YYYY-MM-DD ## Threat Model - Top threat: <STRIDE category> — <description> - Likelihood: H/M/L | Impact: H/M/L - ALE: $X / year ## Blast Radius - Data exposed (worst case): <description> - Users affected: N - Estimated cost: $X ## Detection - MTTD target: X hours - Current MTTD: X hours - Detection rule: <name> ## Response - IR runbook: ✅ / ❌ - Last tabletop: <date> ## Regulatory - Frameworks in scope: SOC 2 / ISO 27001 / HIPAA / GDPR - Notification window: X hours/days ## Vendors - New vendors added: N - DPAs signed: N / N - Security reviews complete: N / N ## Verdict 🟢 SHIP | 🟡 MITIGATE THEN SHIP | 🔴 BLOCK ``` ## Routing - `/cs:cto-review` — architecture alignment - `/cs:gc-review` — DPA, regulatory implications - `/cs:decide` — log risk acceptance - `/cs:boardroom` — for CRITICAL risks ## Related - Agent: [`cs-ciso-advisor`](../../agents/cs-ciso-advisor.md) - Skill: [`ciso-advisor`](../../../skills/ciso-advisor/SKILL.md) - Compliance: `../../../../ra-qm-team/` --- **Version:** 1.0.0
Related skills 6
to-prd
Turn the current conversation context into a PRD and publish it to the project issue tracker. Use when user wants to create a PRD from the current context.
to-issues
Break a plan, spec, or PRD into independently-grabbable issues on the project issue tracker using tracer-bullet vertical slices. Use when user wants to convert a plan into issues, create implementation tickets, or break down work into issues.
Boardroom
/cs:boardroom <brief> — 6-phase multi-role deliberation across the C-suite with Phase 2 isolation, critic pre-screen, and synthesis. Outputs a board memo.
Brief
/cs:brief <topic> — Generate a one-page strategy brief from an office-hours intake. First step in the strategic sprint pipeline.
C Level Agents
Founder-mode executive team. 8 cs-* C-suite agents (CFO, CMO, CRO, CPO, COO, CHRO, CISO, Chief of Staff) and 17 /cs:* slash commands for forcing-question office hours, multi-role boardroom delibera...
Caio Review
/cs:caio-review <plan> — Eval-demanding Chief AI Officer interrogation of any plan that involves AI: model selection, risk classification, cost economics, or AI hiring.