Scenario War Room
Cross-functional what-if modeling for cascading multi-variable scenarios. Unlike single-assumption stress testing, this models compound adversity across all business functions simultaneously. Use w...
Cross-functional what-if modeling for cascading multi-variable scenarios. Unlike single-assumption stress testing, this models compound adversity across all business functions simultaneously. Use when facing complex risk scenarios, strategic decisions with major downside, or when the user asks 'what if X AND Y both happen?'
Install
Quick install
npx skills add https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/tree/main/c-level-advisor/skills/scenario-war-roomnpx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill scenario-war-room --agent claude-codenpx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill scenario-war-room --agent cursornpx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill scenario-war-room --agent codexnpx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill scenario-war-room --agent opencodenpx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill scenario-war-room --agent github-copilotnpx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill scenario-war-room --agent windsurfMore install options
Shorthand — useful for multi-skill repos:
npx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill scenario-war-roomManual — clone the repo and drop the folder into your agent's skills directory:
git clone https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills.gitcp -r claude-skills/c-level-advisor/skills/scenario-war-room ~/.claude/skills/Scenario War Room
Model cascading what-if scenarios across all business functions. Not single-assumption stress tests — compound adversity that shows how one problem creates the next.
Keywords
scenario planning, war room, what-if analysis, risk modeling, cascading effects, compound risk, adversity planning, contingency planning, stress test, crisis planning, multi-variable scenario, pre-mortemQuick Start
python scripts/scenario_modeler.py # Interactive scenario builder with cascade modeling
Or describe the scenario:
/war-room "What if we lose our top customer AND miss the Q3 fundraise?"
/war-room "What if 3 engineers quit AND we need to ship by Q3?"
/war-room "What if our market shrinks 30% AND a competitor raises $50M?"
What This Is Not
- Not a single-assumption stress test (that's
/em:stress-test) - Not financial modeling only — every function gets modeled
- Not worst-case-only — models 3 severity levels
- Not paralysis by analysis — outputs concrete hedges and triggers
Framework: 6-Step Cascade Model
Step 1: Define Scenario Variables (max 3)
State each variable with:- What changes — specific, quantified if possible
- Probability — your best estimate
- Timeline — when it hits
Variable A: Top customer (28% ARR) gives 60-day termination notice
Probability: 15% | Timeline: Within 90 days
Variable B: Series A fundraise delayed 6 months beyond target close
Probability: 25% | Timeline: Q3
Variable C: Lead engineer resigns
Probability: 20% | Timeline: Unknown
Step 2: Domain Impact Mapping
For each variable, each relevant role models impact:
| Domain | Owner | Models |
|--------|-------|--------|
| Cash & runway | CFO | Burn impact, runway change, bridge options |
| Revenue | CRO | ARR gap, churn cascade risk, pipeline |
| Product | CPO | Roadmap impact, PMF risk |
| Engineering | CTO | Velocity impact, key person risk |
| People | CHRO | Attrition cascade, hiring freeze implications |
| Operations | COO | Capacity, OKR impact, process risk |
| Security | CISO | Compliance timeline risk |
| Market | CMO | CAC impact, competitive exposure |
Step 3: Cascade Effect Mapping
This is the core. Show how Variable A triggers consequences in domains that trigger Variable B's effects:
TRIGGER: Customer churn ($560K ARR)
↓
CFO: Runway drops 14 → 8 months
↓
CHRO: Hiring freeze; retention risk increases (morale hit)
↓
CTO: 3 open engineering reqs frozen; roadmap slips
↓
CPO: Q4 feature launch delayed → customer retention risk
↓
CRO: NRR drops; existing accounts see reduced velocity → more churn risk
↓
CFO: [Secondary cascade — potential death spiral if not interrupted]
Name the cascade explicitly. Show where it can be interrupted.
Step 4: Severity Matrix
Model three scenarios:
| Scenario | Definition | Recovery |
|----------|------------|---------|
| Base | One variable hits; others don't | Manageable with plan |
| Stress | Two variables hit simultaneously | Requires significant response |
| Severe | All variables hit; full cascade | Existential; requires board intervention |
For each severity level:
- Runway impact
- ARR impact
- Headcount impact
- Timeline to unacceptable state (trigger point)
Step 5: Trigger Points (Early Warning Signals)
Define the measurable signal that tells you a scenario is unfolding before it's confirmed:
Trigger for Customer Churn Risk:
- Sponsor goes dark for >3 weeks
- Usage drops >25% MoM
- No Q1 QBR confirmed by Dec 1
Trigger for Fundraise Delay:
- <3 term sheets after 60 days of process
- Lead investor requests >30-day extension on DD
- Competitor raises at lower valuation (market signal)
Trigger for Engineering Attrition:
- Glassdoor activity from engineering team
- 2+ referral interview requests from engineers
- Above-market offer counter-required in last 3 months
Step 6: Hedging Strategies
For each scenario: actions to take now (before the scenario materializes) that reduce impact if it does.
| Hedge | Cost | Impact | Owner | Deadline |
|-------|------|--------|-------|---------|
| Establish $500K credit line | $5K/year | Buys 3 months if churn hits | CFO | 60 days |
| 12-month retention bonus for 3 key engineers | $90K | Locks team through fundraise | CHRO | 30 days |
| Diversify to <20% revenue concentration per customer | Sales effort | Reduces single-customer risk | CRO | 2 quarters |
| Compress fundraise timeline, start parallel process | CEO time | Closes before runways merge | CEO | Immediate |
---
Output Format
Every war room session produces:
SCENARIO: [Name]
Variables: [A, B, C]
Most likely path: [which combination actually plays out, with probability]
SEVERITY LEVELS
Base (A only): [runway/ARR impact] — recovery: [X actions]
Stress (A+B): [runway/ARR impact] — recovery: [X actions]
Severe (A+B+C): [runway/ARR impact] — existential risk: [yes/no]
CASCADE MAP
[A → domain impact → B trigger → domain impact → end state]
EARLY WARNING SIGNALS
- [Signal 1 → which scenario it indicates]
- [Signal 2 → which scenario it indicates]
- [Signal 3 → which scenario it indicates]
HEDGES (take these actions now)
1. [Action] — cost: $X — impact: [what it buys] — owner: [role] — deadline: [date]
2. [Action] — cost: $X — impact: [what it buys] — owner: [role] — deadline: [date]
3. [Action] — cost: $X — impact: [what it buys] — owner: [role] — deadline: [date]
RECOMMENDED DECISION
[One paragraph. What to do, in what order, and why.]
---
Rules for Good War Room Sessions
Max 3 variables per scenario. More than 3 is noise — you can't meaningfully prepare for 5-variable collapse. Model the 3 that actually worry you.
Quantify or estimate. "Revenue drops" is not useful. "$420K ARR at risk over 60 days" is. Use ranges if uncertain.
Don't stop at first-order effects. The damage is always in the cascade, not the initial hit.
Model recovery, not just impact. Every scenario should have a "what we do" path.
Separate base case from sensitivity. Don't conflate "what probably happens" with "what could happen."
Don't over-model. 3-4 scenarios per planning cycle is the right number. More creates analysis paralysis.
---
Common Scenarios by Stage
Seed:
- Co-founder leaves + product misses launch
- Funding runs out + bridge terms unfavorable
Series A:
- Miss ARR target + fundraise delayed
- Key customer churns + competitor raises
Series B:
- Market contraction + burn multiple spikes
- Lead investor wants pivot + team resists
Integration with C-Suite Roles
| Scenario Type | Primary Roles | Cascade To |
|--------------|---------------|------------|
| Revenue miss | CRO, CFO | CMO (pipeline), COO (cuts), CHRO (layoffs) |
| Key person departure | CHRO, COO | CTO (if eng), CRO (if sales) |
| Fundraise failure | CFO, CEO | COO (runway extension), CHRO (hiring freeze) |
| Security breach | CISO, CTO | CEO (comms), CFO (cost), CRO (customer impact) |
| Market shift | CEO, CPO | CMO (repositioning), CRO (new segments) |
| Competitor move | CMO, CRO | CPO (roadmap response), CEO (strategy) |
References
references/scenario-planning.md— Shell methodology, pre-mortem, Monte Carlo, cascade frameworksscripts/scenario_modeler.py— CLI tool for structured scenario modeling
SKILL.md source
--- name: scenario-war-room description: Cross-functional what-if modeling for cascading multi-variable scenarios. Unlike single-assumption stress testing, this models compound adversity across all business functions simultaneously. Use w... --- # Scenario War Room Model cascading what-if scenarios across all business functions. Not single-assumption stress tests — compound adversity that shows how one problem creates the next. ## Keywords scenario planning, war room, what-if analysis, risk modeling, cascading effects, compound risk, adversity planning, contingency planning, stress test, crisis planning, multi-variable scenario, pre-mortem ## Quick Start ```bash python scripts/scenario_modeler.py # Interactive scenario builder with cascade modeling ``` Or describe the scenario: ``` /war-room "What if we lose our top customer AND miss the Q3 fundraise?" /war-room "What if 3 engineers quit AND we need to ship by Q3?" /war-room "What if our market shrinks 30% AND a competitor raises $50M?" ``` ## What This Is Not - **Not** a single-assumption stress test (that's `/em:stress-test`) - **Not** financial modeling only — every function gets modeled - **Not** worst-case-only — models 3 severity levels - **Not** paralysis by analysis — outputs concrete hedges and triggers ## Framework: 6-Step Cascade Model ### Step 1: Define Scenario Variables (max 3) State each variable with: - **What changes** — specific, quantified if possible - **Probability** — your best estimate - **Timeline** — when it hits ``` Variable A: Top customer (28% ARR) gives 60-day termination notice Probability: 15% | Timeline: Within 90 days Variable B: Series A fundraise delayed 6 months beyond target close Probability: 25% | Timeline: Q3 Variable C: Lead engineer resigns Probability: 20% | Timeline: Unknown ``` ### Step 2: Domain Impact Mapping For each variable, each relevant role models impact: | Domain | Owner | Models | |--------|-------|--------| | Cash & runway | CFO | Burn impact, runway change, bridge options | | Revenue | CRO | ARR gap, churn cascade risk, pipeline | | Product | CPO | Roadmap impact, PMF risk | | Engineering | CTO | Velocity impact, key person risk | | People | CHRO | Attrition cascade, hiring freeze implications | | Operations | COO | Capacity, OKR impact, process risk | | Security | CISO | Compliance timeline risk | | Market | CMO | CAC impact, competitive exposure | ### Step 3: Cascade Effect Mapping This is the core. Show how Variable A triggers consequences in domains that trigger Variable B's effects: ``` TRIGGER: Customer churn ($560K ARR) ↓ CFO: Runway drops 14 → 8 months ↓ CHRO: Hiring freeze; retention risk increases (morale hit) ↓ CTO: 3 open engineering reqs frozen; roadmap slips ↓ CPO: Q4 feature launch delayed → customer retention risk ↓ CRO: NRR drops; existing accounts see reduced velocity → more churn risk ↓ CFO: [Secondary cascade — potential death spiral if not interrupted] ``` Name the cascade explicitly. Show where it can be interrupted. ### Step 4: Severity Matrix Model three scenarios: | Scenario | Definition | Recovery | |----------|------------|---------| | **Base** | One variable hits; others don't | Manageable with plan | | **Stress** | Two variables hit simultaneously | Requires significant response | | **Severe** | All variables hit; full cascade | Existential; requires board intervention | For each severity level: - Runway impact - ARR impact - Headcount impact - Timeline to unacceptable state (trigger point) ### Step 5: Trigger Points (Early Warning Signals) Define the measurable signal that tells you a scenario is unfolding **before** it's confirmed: ``` Trigger for Customer Churn Risk: - Sponsor goes dark for >3 weeks - Usage drops >25% MoM - No Q1 QBR confirmed by Dec 1 Trigger for Fundraise Delay: - <3 term sheets after 60 days of process - Lead investor requests >30-day extension on DD - Competitor raises at lower valuation (market signal) Trigger for Engineering Attrition: - Glassdoor activity from engineering team - 2+ referral interview requests from engineers - Above-market offer counter-required in last 3 months ``` ### Step 6: Hedging Strategies For each scenario: actions to take **now** (before the scenario materializes) that reduce impact if it does. | Hedge | Cost | Impact | Owner | Deadline | |-------|------|--------|-------|---------| | Establish $500K credit line | $5K/year | Buys 3 months if churn hits | CFO | 60 days | | 12-month retention bonus for 3 key engineers | $90K | Locks team through fundraise | CHRO | 30 days | | Diversify to <20% revenue concentration per customer | Sales effort | Reduces single-customer risk | CRO | 2 quarters | | Compress fundraise timeline, start parallel process | CEO time | Closes before runways merge | CEO | Immediate | --- ## Output Format Every war room session produces: ``` SCENARIO: [Name] Variables: [A, B, C] Most likely path: [which combination actually plays out, with probability] SEVERITY LEVELS Base (A only): [runway/ARR impact] — recovery: [X actions] Stress (A+B): [runway/ARR impact] — recovery: [X actions] Severe (A+B+C): [runway/ARR impact] — existential risk: [yes/no] CASCADE MAP [A → domain impact → B trigger → domain impact → end state] EARLY WARNING SIGNALS - [Signal 1 → which scenario it indicates] - [Signal 2 → which scenario it indicates] - [Signal 3 → which scenario it indicates] HEDGES (take these actions now) 1. [Action] — cost: $X — impact: [what it buys] — owner: [role] — deadline: [date] 2. [Action] — cost: $X — impact: [what it buys] — owner: [role] — deadline: [date] 3. [Action] — cost: $X — impact: [what it buys] — owner: [role] — deadline: [date] RECOMMENDED DECISION [One paragraph. What to do, in what order, and why.] ``` --- ## Rules for Good War Room Sessions **Max 3 variables per scenario.** More than 3 is noise — you can't meaningfully prepare for 5-variable collapse. Model the 3 that actually worry you. **Quantify or estimate.** "Revenue drops" is not useful. "$420K ARR at risk over 60 days" is. Use ranges if uncertain. **Don't stop at first-order effects.** The damage is always in the cascade, not the initial hit. **Model recovery, not just impact.** Every scenario should have a "what we do" path. **Separate base case from sensitivity.** Don't conflate "what probably happens" with "what could happen." **Don't over-model.** 3-4 scenarios per planning cycle is the right number. More creates analysis paralysis. --- ## Common Scenarios by Stage **Seed:** - Co-founder leaves + product misses launch - Funding runs out + bridge terms unfavorable **Series A:** - Miss ARR target + fundraise delayed - Key customer churns + competitor raises **Series B:** - Market contraction + burn multiple spikes - Lead investor wants pivot + team resists ## Integration with C-Suite Roles | Scenario Type | Primary Roles | Cascade To | |--------------|---------------|------------| | Revenue miss | CRO, CFO | CMO (pipeline), COO (cuts), CHRO (layoffs) | | Key person departure | CHRO, COO | CTO (if eng), CRO (if sales) | | Fundraise failure | CFO, CEO | COO (runway extension), CHRO (hiring freeze) | | Security breach | CISO, CTO | CEO (comms), CFO (cost), CRO (customer impact) | | Market shift | CEO, CPO | CMO (repositioning), CRO (new segments) | | Competitor move | CMO, CRO | CPO (roadmap response), CEO (strategy) | ## References - `references/scenario-planning.md` — Shell methodology, pre-mortem, Monte Carlo, cascade frameworks - `scripts/scenario_modeler.py` — CLI tool for structured scenario modeling
Related skills 6
to-prd
Turn the current conversation context into a PRD and publish it to the project issue tracker. Use when user wants to create a PRD from the current context.
to-issues
Break a plan, spec, or PRD into independently-grabbable issues on the project issue tracker using tracer-bullet vertical slices. Use when user wants to convert a plan into issues, create implementation tickets, or break down work into issues.
Boardroom
/cs:boardroom <brief> — 6-phase multi-role deliberation across the C-suite with Phase 2 isolation, critic pre-screen, and synthesis. Outputs a board memo.
Brief
/cs:brief <topic> — Generate a one-page strategy brief from an office-hours intake. First step in the strategic sprint pipeline.
C Level Agents
Founder-mode executive team. 8 cs-* C-suite agents (CFO, CMO, CRO, CPO, COO, CHRO, CISO, Chief of Staff) and 17 /cs:* slash commands for forcing-question office hours, multi-role boardroom delibera...
Caio Review
/cs:caio-review <plan> — Eval-demanding Chief AI Officer interrogation of any plan that involves AI: model selection, risk classification, cost economics, or AI hiring.