Information Security Manager Iso27001
ISO 27001 ISMS implementation and cybersecurity governance for HealthTech and MedTech companies. Use for ISMS design, security risk assessment, control implementation, ISO 27001 certification, secu...
ISO 27001 ISMS implementation and cybersecurity governance for HealthTech and MedTech companies. Use for ISMS design, security risk assessment, control implementation, ISO 27001 certification, security audits, incident response, and compliance verification. Covers ISO 27001, ISO 27002, healthcare security, and medical device cybersecurity.
Install
Quick install
npx skills add https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/tree/main/ra-qm-team/skills/information-security-manager-iso27001npx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill information-security-manager-iso27001 --agent claude-codenpx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill information-security-manager-iso27001 --agent cursornpx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill information-security-manager-iso27001 --agent codexnpx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill information-security-manager-iso27001 --agent opencodenpx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill information-security-manager-iso27001 --agent github-copilotnpx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill information-security-manager-iso27001 --agent windsurfMore install options
Shorthand — useful for multi-skill repos:
npx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill information-security-manager-iso27001Manual — clone the repo and drop the folder into your agent's skills directory:
git clone https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills.gitcp -r claude-skills/ra-qm-team/skills/information-security-manager-iso27001 ~/.claude/skills/Information Security Manager - ISO 27001
Implement and manage Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) aligned with ISO 27001:2022 and healthcare regulatory requirements.
---
Table of Contents
- [Trigger Phrases](#trigger-phrases)
- [Quick Start](#quick-start)
- [Tools](#tools)
- [Workflows](#workflows)
- [Reference Guides](#reference-guides)
- [Validation Checkpoints](#validation-checkpoints)
---
Trigger Phrases
Use this skill when you hear:
- "implement ISO 27001"
- "ISMS implementation"
- "security risk assessment"
- "information security policy"
- "ISO 27001 certification"
- "security controls implementation"
- "incident response plan"
- "healthcare data security"
- "medical device cybersecurity"
- "security compliance audit"
---
Quick Start
Run Security Risk Assessment
python scripts/risk_assessment.py --scope "patient-data-system" --output risk_register.json
Check Compliance Status
python scripts/compliance_checker.py --standard iso27001 --controls-file controls.csv
Generate Gap Analysis Report
python scripts/compliance_checker.py --standard iso27001 --gap-analysis --output gaps.md
---
Tools
risk_assessment.py
Automated security risk assessment following ISO 27001 Clause 6.1.2 methodology.
Usage:
# Full risk assessment
python scripts/risk_assessment.py --scope "cloud-infrastructure" --output risks.json
# Healthcare-specific assessment
python scripts/risk_assessment.py --scope "ehr-system" --template healthcare --output risks.json
# Quick asset-based assessment
python scripts/risk_assessment.py --assets assets.csv --output risks.json
Parameters:
| Parameter | Required | Description |
|-----------|----------|-------------|
| --scope | Yes | System or area to assess |
| --template | No | Assessment template: general, healthcare, cloud |
| --assets | No | CSV file with asset inventory |
| --output | No | Output file (default: stdout) |
| --format | No | Output format: json, csv, markdown |
Output:
- Asset inventory with classification
- Threat and vulnerability mapping
- Risk scores (likelihood × impact)
- Treatment recommendations
- Residual risk calculations
compliance_checker.py
Verify ISO 27001/27002 control implementation status.
Usage:
# Check all ISO 27001 controls
python scripts/compliance_checker.py --standard iso27001
# Gap analysis with recommendations
python scripts/compliance_checker.py --standard iso27001 --gap-analysis
# Check specific control domains
python scripts/compliance_checker.py --standard iso27001 --domains "access-control,cryptography"
# Export compliance report
python scripts/compliance_checker.py --standard iso27001 --output compliance_report.md
Parameters:
| Parameter | Required | Description |
|-----------|----------|-------------|
| --standard | Yes | Standard to check: iso27001, iso27002, hipaa |
| --controls-file | No | CSV with current control status |
| --gap-analysis | No | Include remediation recommendations |
| --domains | No | Specific control domains to check |
| --output | No | Output file path |
Output:
- Control implementation status
- Compliance percentage by domain
- Gap analysis with priorities
- Remediation recommendations
---
Workflows
Workflow 1: ISMS Implementation
Step 1: Define Scope and Context
Document organizational context and ISMS boundaries:
- Identify interested parties and requirements
- Define ISMS scope and boundaries
- Document internal/external issues
Validation: Scope statement reviewed and approved by management.
Step 2: Conduct Risk Assessment
python scripts/risk_assessment.py --scope "full-organization" --template general --output initial_risks.json
- Identify information assets
- Assess threats and vulnerabilities
- Calculate risk levels
- Determine risk treatment options
Validation: Risk register contains all critical assets with assigned owners.
Step 3: Select and Implement Controls
Map risks to ISO 27002 controls:
python scripts/compliance_checker.py --standard iso27002 --gap-analysis --output control_gaps.md
Control categories:
- Organizational (policies, roles, responsibilities)
- People (screening, awareness, training)
- Physical (perimeters, equipment, media)
- Technological (access, crypto, network, application)
Validation: Statement of Applicability (SoA) documents all controls with justification.
Step 4: Establish Monitoring
Define security metrics:
- Incident count and severity trends
- Control effectiveness scores
- Training completion rates
- Audit findings closure rate
Validation: Dashboard shows real-time compliance status.
Workflow 2: Security Risk Assessment
Step 1: Asset Identification
Create asset inventory:
| Asset Type | Examples | Classification |
|------------|----------|----------------|
| Information | Patient records, source code | Confidential |
| Software | EHR system, APIs | Critical |
| Hardware | Servers, medical devices | High |
| Services | Cloud hosting, backup | High |
| People | Admin accounts, developers | Varies |
Validation: All assets have assigned owners and classifications.
Step 2: Threat Analysis
Identify threats per asset category:
| Asset | Threats | Likelihood |
|-------|---------|------------|
| Patient data | Unauthorized access, breach | High |
| Medical devices | Malware, tampering | Medium |
| Cloud services | Misconfiguration, outage | Medium |
| Credentials | Phishing, brute force | High |
Validation: Threat model covers top-10 industry threats.
Step 3: Vulnerability Assessment
python scripts/risk_assessment.py --scope "network-infrastructure" --output vuln_risks.json
Document vulnerabilities:
- Technical (unpatched systems, weak configs)
- Process (missing procedures, gaps)
- People (lack of training, insider risk)
Validation: Vulnerability scan results mapped to risk register.
Step 4: Risk Evaluation and Treatment
Calculate risk: Risk = Likelihood × Impact
| Risk Level | Score | Treatment |
|------------|-------|-----------|
| Critical | 20-25 | Immediate action required |
| High | 15-19 | Treatment plan within 30 days |
| Medium | 10-14 | Treatment plan within 90 days |
| Low | 5-9 | Accept or monitor |
| Minimal | 1-4 | Accept |
Validation: All high/critical risks have approved treatment plans.
Workflow 3: Incident Response
Step 1: Detection and Reporting
Incident categories:
- Security breach (unauthorized access)
- Malware infection
- Data leakage
- System compromise
- Policy violation
Validation: Incident logged within 15 minutes of detection.
Step 2: Triage and Classification
| Severity | Criteria | Response Time |
|----------|----------|---------------|
| Critical | Data breach, system down | Immediate |
| High | Active threat, significant risk | 1 hour |
| Medium | Contained threat, limited impact | 4 hours |
| Low | Minor violation, no impact | 24 hours |
Validation: Severity assigned and escalation triggered if needed.
Step 3: Containment and Eradication
Immediate actions:
- Isolate affected systems
- Preserve evidence
- Block threat vectors
- Remove malicious artifacts
Validation: Containment confirmed, no ongoing compromise.
Step 4: Recovery and Lessons Learned
Post-incident activities:
- Restore systems from clean backups
- Verify integrity before reconnection
- Document timeline and actions
- Conduct post-incident review
- Update controls and procedures
Validation: Post-incident report completed within 5 business days.
---
Reference Guides
When to Use Each Reference
references/iso27001-controls.md
- Control selection for SoA
- Implementation guidance
- Evidence requirements
- Audit preparation
references/risk-assessment-guide.md
- Risk methodology selection
- Asset classification criteria
- Threat modeling approaches
- Risk calculation methods
references/incident-response.md
- Response procedures
- Escalation matrices
- Communication templates
- Recovery checklists
---
Validation Checkpoints
ISMS Implementation Validation
| Phase | Checkpoint | Evidence Required |
|-------|------------|-------------------|
| Scope | Scope approved | Signed scope document |
| Risk | Register complete | Risk register with owners |
| Controls | SoA approved | Statement of Applicability |
| Operation | Metrics active | Dashboard screenshots |
| Audit | Internal audit done | Audit report |
Certification Readiness
Before Stage 1 audit:
- [ ] ISMS scope documented and approved
- [ ] Information security policy published
- [ ] Risk assessment completed
- [ ] Statement of Applicability finalized
- [ ] Internal audit conducted
- [ ] Management review completed
- [ ] Nonconformities addressed
Before Stage 2 audit:
- [ ] Controls implemented and operational
- [ ] Evidence of effectiveness available
- [ ] Staff trained and aware
- [ ] Incidents logged and managed
- [ ] Metrics collected for 3+ months
Compliance Verification
Run periodic checks:
# Monthly compliance check
python scripts/compliance_checker.py --standard iso27001 --output monthly_$(date +%Y%m).md
# Quarterly gap analysis
python scripts/compliance_checker.py --standard iso27001 --gap-analysis --output quarterly_gaps.md
---
Worked Example: Healthcare Risk Assessment
Scenario: Assess security risks for a patient data management system.
Step 1: Define Assets
python scripts/risk_assessment.py --scope "patient-data-system" --template healthcare
Asset inventory output:
| Asset ID | Asset | Type | Owner | Classification |
|----------|-------|------|-------|----------------|
| A001 | Patient database | Information | DBA Team | Confidential |
| A002 | EHR application | Software | App Team | Critical |
| A003 | Database server | Hardware | Infra Team | High |
| A004 | Admin credentials | Access | Security | Critical |
Step 2: Identify Risks
Risk register output:
| Risk ID | Asset | Threat | Vulnerability | L | I | Score |
|---------|-------|--------|---------------|---|---|-------|
| R001 | A001 | Data breach | Weak encryption | 3 | 5 | 15 |
| R002 | A002 | SQL injection | Input validation | 4 | 4 | 16 |
| R003 | A004 | Credential theft | No MFA | 4 | 5 | 20 |
Step 3: Determine Treatment
| Risk | Treatment | Control | Timeline |
|------|-----------|---------|----------|
| R001 | Mitigate | Implement AES-256 encryption | 30 days |
| R002 | Mitigate | Add input validation, WAF | 14 days |
| R003 | Mitigate | Enforce MFA for all admins | 7 days |
Step 4: Verify Implementation
python scripts/compliance_checker.py --controls-file implemented_controls.csv
Verification output:
Control Implementation Status
=============================
Cryptography (A.8.24): IMPLEMENTED
- AES-256 at rest: YES
- TLS 1.3 in transit: YES
Access Control (A.8.5): IMPLEMENTED
- MFA enabled: YES
- Admin accounts: 100% coverage
Application Security (A.8.26): PARTIAL
- Input validation: YES
- WAF deployed: PENDING
Overall Compliance: 87%
SKILL.md source
--- name: information-security-manager-iso27001 description: ISO 27001 ISMS implementation and cybersecurity governance for HealthTech and MedTech companies. Use for ISMS design, security risk assessment, control implementation, ISO 27001 certification, secu... --- # Information Security Manager - ISO 27001 Implement and manage Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) aligned with ISO 27001:2022 and healthcare regulatory requirements. --- ## Table of Contents - [Trigger Phrases](#trigger-phrases) - [Quick Start](#quick-start) - [Tools](#tools) - [Workflows](#workflows) - [Reference Guides](#reference-guides) - [Validation Checkpoints](#validation-checkpoints) --- ## Trigger Phrases Use this skill when you hear: - "implement ISO 27001" - "ISMS implementation" - "security risk assessment" - "information security policy" - "ISO 27001 certification" - "security controls implementation" - "incident response plan" - "healthcare data security" - "medical device cybersecurity" - "security compliance audit" --- ## Quick Start ### Run Security Risk Assessment ```bash python scripts/risk_assessment.py --scope "patient-data-system" --output risk_register.json ``` ### Check Compliance Status ```bash python scripts/compliance_checker.py --standard iso27001 --controls-file controls.csv ``` ### Generate Gap Analysis Report ```bash python scripts/compliance_checker.py --standard iso27001 --gap-analysis --output gaps.md ``` --- ## Tools ### risk_assessment.py Automated security risk assessment following ISO 27001 Clause 6.1.2 methodology. **Usage:** ```bash # Full risk assessment python scripts/risk_assessment.py --scope "cloud-infrastructure" --output risks.json # Healthcare-specific assessment python scripts/risk_assessment.py --scope "ehr-system" --template healthcare --output risks.json # Quick asset-based assessment python scripts/risk_assessment.py --assets assets.csv --output risks.json ``` **Parameters:** | Parameter | Required | Description | |-----------|----------|-------------| | `--scope` | Yes | System or area to assess | | `--template` | No | Assessment template: `general`, `healthcare`, `cloud` | | `--assets` | No | CSV file with asset inventory | | `--output` | No | Output file (default: stdout) | | `--format` | No | Output format: `json`, `csv`, `markdown` | **Output:** - Asset inventory with classification - Threat and vulnerability mapping - Risk scores (likelihood × impact) - Treatment recommendations - Residual risk calculations ### compliance_checker.py Verify ISO 27001/27002 control implementation status. **Usage:** ```bash # Check all ISO 27001 controls python scripts/compliance_checker.py --standard iso27001 # Gap analysis with recommendations python scripts/compliance_checker.py --standard iso27001 --gap-analysis # Check specific control domains python scripts/compliance_checker.py --standard iso27001 --domains "access-control,cryptography" # Export compliance report python scripts/compliance_checker.py --standard iso27001 --output compliance_report.md ``` **Parameters:** | Parameter | Required | Description | |-----------|----------|-------------| | `--standard` | Yes | Standard to check: `iso27001`, `iso27002`, `hipaa` | | `--controls-file` | No | CSV with current control status | | `--gap-analysis` | No | Include remediation recommendations | | `--domains` | No | Specific control domains to check | | `--output` | No | Output file path | **Output:** - Control implementation status - Compliance percentage by domain - Gap analysis with priorities - Remediation recommendations --- ## Workflows ### Workflow 1: ISMS Implementation **Step 1: Define Scope and Context** Document organizational context and ISMS boundaries: - Identify interested parties and requirements - Define ISMS scope and boundaries - Document internal/external issues **Validation:** Scope statement reviewed and approved by management. **Step 2: Conduct Risk Assessment** ```bash python scripts/risk_assessment.py --scope "full-organization" --template general --output initial_risks.json ``` - Identify information assets - Assess threats and vulnerabilities - Calculate risk levels - Determine risk treatment options **Validation:** Risk register contains all critical assets with assigned owners. **Step 3: Select and Implement Controls** Map risks to ISO 27002 controls: ```bash python scripts/compliance_checker.py --standard iso27002 --gap-analysis --output control_gaps.md ``` Control categories: - Organizational (policies, roles, responsibilities) - People (screening, awareness, training) - Physical (perimeters, equipment, media) - Technological (access, crypto, network, application) **Validation:** Statement of Applicability (SoA) documents all controls with justification. **Step 4: Establish Monitoring** Define security metrics: - Incident count and severity trends - Control effectiveness scores - Training completion rates - Audit findings closure rate **Validation:** Dashboard shows real-time compliance status. ### Workflow 2: Security Risk Assessment **Step 1: Asset Identification** Create asset inventory: | Asset Type | Examples | Classification | |------------|----------|----------------| | Information | Patient records, source code | Confidential | | Software | EHR system, APIs | Critical | | Hardware | Servers, medical devices | High | | Services | Cloud hosting, backup | High | | People | Admin accounts, developers | Varies | **Validation:** All assets have assigned owners and classifications. **Step 2: Threat Analysis** Identify threats per asset category: | Asset | Threats | Likelihood | |-------|---------|------------| | Patient data | Unauthorized access, breach | High | | Medical devices | Malware, tampering | Medium | | Cloud services | Misconfiguration, outage | Medium | | Credentials | Phishing, brute force | High | **Validation:** Threat model covers top-10 industry threats. **Step 3: Vulnerability Assessment** ```bash python scripts/risk_assessment.py --scope "network-infrastructure" --output vuln_risks.json ``` Document vulnerabilities: - Technical (unpatched systems, weak configs) - Process (missing procedures, gaps) - People (lack of training, insider risk) **Validation:** Vulnerability scan results mapped to risk register. **Step 4: Risk Evaluation and Treatment** Calculate risk: `Risk = Likelihood × Impact` | Risk Level | Score | Treatment | |------------|-------|-----------| | Critical | 20-25 | Immediate action required | | High | 15-19 | Treatment plan within 30 days | | Medium | 10-14 | Treatment plan within 90 days | | Low | 5-9 | Accept or monitor | | Minimal | 1-4 | Accept | **Validation:** All high/critical risks have approved treatment plans. ### Workflow 3: Incident Response **Step 1: Detection and Reporting** Incident categories: - Security breach (unauthorized access) - Malware infection - Data leakage - System compromise - Policy violation **Validation:** Incident logged within 15 minutes of detection. **Step 2: Triage and Classification** | Severity | Criteria | Response Time | |----------|----------|---------------| | Critical | Data breach, system down | Immediate | | High | Active threat, significant risk | 1 hour | | Medium | Contained threat, limited impact | 4 hours | | Low | Minor violation, no impact | 24 hours | **Validation:** Severity assigned and escalation triggered if needed. **Step 3: Containment and Eradication** Immediate actions: 1. Isolate affected systems 2. Preserve evidence 3. Block threat vectors 4. Remove malicious artifacts **Validation:** Containment confirmed, no ongoing compromise. **Step 4: Recovery and Lessons Learned** Post-incident activities: 1. Restore systems from clean backups 2. Verify integrity before reconnection 3. Document timeline and actions 4. Conduct post-incident review 5. Update controls and procedures **Validation:** Post-incident report completed within 5 business days. --- ## Reference Guides ### When to Use Each Reference **references/iso27001-controls.md** - Control selection for SoA - Implementation guidance - Evidence requirements - Audit preparation **references/risk-assessment-guide.md** - Risk methodology selection - Asset classification criteria - Threat modeling approaches - Risk calculation methods **references/incident-response.md** - Response procedures - Escalation matrices - Communication templates - Recovery checklists --- ## Validation Checkpoints ### ISMS Implementation Validation | Phase | Checkpoint | Evidence Required | |-------|------------|-------------------| | Scope | Scope approved | Signed scope document | | Risk | Register complete | Risk register with owners | | Controls | SoA approved | Statement of Applicability | | Operation | Metrics active | Dashboard screenshots | | Audit | Internal audit done | Audit report | ### Certification Readiness Before Stage 1 audit: - [ ] ISMS scope documented and approved - [ ] Information security policy published - [ ] Risk assessment completed - [ ] Statement of Applicability finalized - [ ] Internal audit conducted - [ ] Management review completed - [ ] Nonconformities addressed Before Stage 2 audit: - [ ] Controls implemented and operational - [ ] Evidence of effectiveness available - [ ] Staff trained and aware - [ ] Incidents logged and managed - [ ] Metrics collected for 3+ months ### Compliance Verification Run periodic checks: ```bash # Monthly compliance check python scripts/compliance_checker.py --standard iso27001 --output monthly_$(date +%Y%m).md # Quarterly gap analysis python scripts/compliance_checker.py --standard iso27001 --gap-analysis --output quarterly_gaps.md ``` --- ## Worked Example: Healthcare Risk Assessment **Scenario:** Assess security risks for a patient data management system. ### Step 1: Define Assets ```bash python scripts/risk_assessment.py --scope "patient-data-system" --template healthcare ``` **Asset inventory output:** | Asset ID | Asset | Type | Owner | Classification | |----------|-------|------|-------|----------------| | A001 | Patient database | Information | DBA Team | Confidential | | A002 | EHR application | Software | App Team | Critical | | A003 | Database server | Hardware | Infra Team | High | | A004 | Admin credentials | Access | Security | Critical | ### Step 2: Identify Risks **Risk register output:** | Risk ID | Asset | Threat | Vulnerability | L | I | Score | |---------|-------|--------|---------------|---|---|-------| | R001 | A001 | Data breach | Weak encryption | 3 | 5 | 15 | | R002 | A002 | SQL injection | Input validation | 4 | 4 | 16 | | R003 | A004 | Credential theft | No MFA | 4 | 5 | 20 | ### Step 3: Determine Treatment | Risk | Treatment | Control | Timeline | |------|-----------|---------|----------| | R001 | Mitigate | Implement AES-256 encryption | 30 days | | R002 | Mitigate | Add input validation, WAF | 14 days | | R003 | Mitigate | Enforce MFA for all admins | 7 days | ### Step 4: Verify Implementation ```bash python scripts/compliance_checker.py --controls-file implemented_controls.csv ``` **Verification output:** ``` Control Implementation Status ============================= Cryptography (A.8.24): IMPLEMENTED - AES-256 at rest: YES - TLS 1.3 in transit: YES Access Control (A.8.5): IMPLEMENTED - MFA enabled: YES - Admin accounts: 100% coverage Application Security (A.8.26): PARTIAL - Input validation: YES - WAF deployed: PENDING Overall Compliance: 87% ```
Related skills 6
agent-browser
Browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, including navigating pages, filling forms, clicking buttons, taking screenshots, extracting data, testing web apps, or automating any browser task. Triggers include requests to "open a website", "fill out a form", "click a button", "take a screenshot", "scrape data from a page", "test this web app", "login to a site", "automate browser actions", or any task requiring programmatic web interaction. Also use...
grill-me
Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".
grill-with-docs
Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates documentation (CONTEXT.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallise. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan against their project's language and documented decisions.
minimal-run-and-audit
RigorPilot trusted execution and reporting skill for README-first deep learning repo reproduction. Use when the task is specifically to capture or normalize evidence from the selected smoke test or documented inference or evaluation command and write standardized `repro_outputs/` files, including patch notes when repository files changed. Do not use for training execution, initial repo intake, generic environment setup, paper lookup, target selection, hidden scientific-meaning changes, or end...
polish
Performs a final quality pass fixing alignment, spacing, consistency, and micro-detail issues before shipping. Use when the user mentions polish, finishing touches, pre-launch review, something looks off, or wants to go from good to great.
critique
Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, automated anti-pattern detection, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.