NEW Browse AI tools across categories — updated daily. See what's new →
★ Featured Testing & Quality

Qms Audit Expert

ISO 13485 internal audit expertise for medical device QMS. Covers audit planning, execution, nonconformity classification, and CAPA verification. Use for internal audit planning, audit execution, f...

Version1.0.0
LicenseMIT
Token count~2,405
UpdatedJun 4, 2026

ISO 13485 internal audit expertise for medical device QMS. Covers audit planning, execution, nonconformity classification, and CAPA verification. Use for internal audit planning, audit execution, finding classification, external audit preparation, or audit program management.

Install

Quick install

via npx skills · works with 57+ agents
npx skills add https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/tree/main/ra-qm-team/skills/qms-audit-expert
Or pick agent:
npx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill qms-audit-expert --agent claude-code
npx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill qms-audit-expert --agent cursor
npx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill qms-audit-expert --agent codex
npx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill qms-audit-expert --agent opencode
npx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill qms-audit-expert --agent github-copilot
npx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill qms-audit-expert --agent windsurf
More install options

Shorthand — useful for multi-skill repos:

npx skills add alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill qms-audit-expert

Manual — clone the repo and drop the folder into your agent's skills directory:

git clone https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills.git
cp -r claude-skills/ra-qm-team/skills/qms-audit-expert ~/.claude/skills/
How to use: Once installed, ask your agent to "use the qms-audit-expert skill" or describe what you want (e.g. "ISO 13485 internal audit expertise for medical device QMS. Covers audit planning"). Requires Node.js 18+.

QMS Audit Expert

ISO 13485 internal audit methodology for medical device quality management systems.

---

Table of Contents

  • [Audit Planning Workflow](#audit-planning-workflow)
  • [Audit Execution](#audit-execution)
  • [Nonconformity Management](#nonconformity-management)
  • [External Audit Preparation](#external-audit-preparation)
  • [Reference Documentation](#reference-documentation)
  • [Tools](#tools)

---

Audit Planning Workflow

Plan risk-based internal audit program:

  1. List all QMS processes requiring audit
  2. Assign risk level to each process (High/Medium/Low)
  3. Review previous audit findings and trends
  4. Determine audit frequency by risk level
  5. Assign qualified auditors (verify independence)
  6. Create annual audit schedule
  7. Communicate schedule to process owners
  8. Validation: All ISO 13485 clauses covered within cycle

Risk-Based Audit Frequency

| Risk Level | Frequency | Criteria |
|------------|-----------|----------|
| High | Quarterly | Design control, CAPA, production validation |
| Medium | Semi-annual | Purchasing, training, document control |
| Low | Annual | Infrastructure, management review (if stable) |

Audit Scope by Clause

| Clause | Process | Focus Areas |
|--------|---------|-------------|
| 4.2 | Document Control | Document approval, distribution, obsolete control |
| 5.6 | Management Review | Inputs complete, decisions documented, actions tracked |
| 6.2 | Training | Competency defined, records complete, effectiveness verified |
| 7.3 | Design Control | Inputs, reviews, V&V, transfer, changes |
| 7.4 | Purchasing | Supplier evaluation, incoming inspection |
| 7.5 | Production | Work instructions, process validation, DHR |
| 7.6 | Calibration | Equipment list, calibration status, out-of-tolerance |
| 8.2.2 | Internal Audit | Schedule compliance, auditor independence |
| 8.3 | NC Product | Identification, segregation, disposition |
| 8.5 | CAPA | Root cause, implementation, effectiveness |

Auditor Independence

Verify auditor independence before assignment:

  • [ ] Auditor not responsible for area being audited
  • [ ] No direct reporting relationship to auditee
  • [ ] Not involved in recent activities under audit
  • [ ] Documented qualification for audit scope

---

Audit Execution

Conduct systematic internal audit:

  1. Prepare audit plan (scope, criteria, schedule)
  2. Review relevant documentation before audit
  3. Conduct opening meeting with auditee
  4. Collect evidence (records, interviews, observation)
  5. Classify findings (Major/Minor/Observation)
  6. Conduct closing meeting with preliminary findings
  7. Prepare audit report within 5 business days
  8. Validation: All scope items covered, findings supported by evidence

Evidence Collection

| Method | Use For | Documentation |
|--------|---------|---------------|
| Document review | Procedures, records | Document number, version, date |
| Interview | Process understanding | Interviewee name, role, summary |
| Observation | Actual practice | What, where, when observed |
| Record trace | Process flow | Record IDs, dates, linkage |

Audit Questions by Clause

Document Control (4.2):


  • Show me the document master list

  • How do you control obsolete documents?

  • Show me evidence of document change approval

Design Control (7.3):


  • Show me the Design History File for [product]

  • Who participates in design reviews?

  • Show me design input to output traceability

CAPA (8.5):


  • Show me the CAPA log with open items

  • How do you determine root cause?

  • Show me effectiveness verification records

See references/iso13485-audit-guide.md for complete question sets.

Finding Documentation

Document each finding with:

Requirement: [Specific ISO 13485 clause or procedure]
Evidence: [What was observed, reviewed, or heard]
Gap: [How evidence fails to meet requirement]

Example:

Requirement: ISO 13485:2016 Clause 7.6 requires calibration
at specified intervals.

Evidence: Calibration records for pH meter (EQ-042) show
last calibration 2024-01-15. Calibration interval is
12 months. Today is 2025-03-20.

Gap: Equipment is 2 months overdue for calibration,
representing a gap in calibration program execution.

---

Nonconformity Management

Classify and manage audit findings:

  1. Evaluate finding against classification criteria
  2. Assign severity (Major/Minor/Observation)
  3. Document finding with objective evidence
  4. Communicate to process owner
  5. Initiate CAPA for Major/Minor findings
  6. Track to closure
  7. Verify effectiveness at follow-up
  8. Validation: Finding closed only after effective CAPA

Classification Criteria

| Category | Definition | CAPA Required | Timeline |
|----------|------------|---------------|----------|
| Major | Systematic failure or absence of element | Yes | 30 days |
| Minor | Isolated lapse or partial implementation | Recommended | 60 days |
| Observation | Improvement opportunity | Optional | As appropriate |

Classification Decision

Is required element absent or failed?
├── Yes → Systematic (multiple instances)? → MAJOR
│   └── No → Could affect product safety? → MAJOR
│       └── No → MINOR
└── No → Deviation from procedure?
    ├── Yes → Recurring? → MAJOR
    │   └── No → MINOR
    └── No → Improvement opportunity? → OBSERVATION

CAPA Integration

| Finding Severity | CAPA Depth | Verification |
|------------------|------------|--------------|
| Major | Full root cause analysis (5-Why, Fishbone) | Next audit or within 6 months |
| Minor | Immediate cause identification | Next scheduled audit |
| Observation | Not required | Noted at next audit |

See references/nonconformity-classification.md for detailed guidance.

---

External Audit Preparation

Prepare for certification body or regulatory audit:

  1. Complete all scheduled internal audits
  2. Verify all findings closed with effective CAPA
  3. Review documentation for currency and accuracy
  4. Conduct management review with audit as input
  5. Prepare facility and personnel
  6. Conduct mock audit (full scope)
  7. Brief personnel on audit protocol
  8. Validation: Mock audit findings addressed before external audit

Pre-Audit Readiness Checklist

Documentation:


  • [ ] Quality Manual current

  • [ ] Procedures reflect actual practice

  • [ ] Records complete and retrievable

  • [ ] Previous audit findings closed

Personnel:


  • [ ] Key personnel available during audit

  • [ ] Subject matter experts identified

  • [ ] Personnel briefed on audit protocol

  • [ ] Escorts assigned

Facility:


  • [ ] Work areas organized

  • [ ] Documents at point of use current

  • [ ] Equipment calibration status visible

  • [ ] Nonconforming product segregated

Mock Audit Protocol

  1. Use external auditor or qualified internal auditor
  2. Cover full scope of upcoming external audit
  3. Simulate actual audit conditions (timing, formality)
  4. Document findings as for real audit
  5. Address all Major and Minor findings before external audit
  6. Brief management on readiness status

---

Reference Documentation

ISO 13485 Audit Guide

references/iso13485-audit-guide.md contains:

  • Clause-by-clause audit methodology
  • Sample audit questions for each clause
  • Evidence collection requirements
  • Common nonconformities by clause
  • Finding severity classification

Nonconformity Classification

references/nonconformity-classification.md contains:

  • Severity classification criteria and decision tree
  • Impact vs. occurrence matrix
  • CAPA integration requirements
  • Finding documentation templates
  • Closure requirements by severity

---

Tools

Audit Schedule Optimizer

# Generate optimized audit schedule
python scripts/audit_schedule_optimizer.py --processes processes.json

# Interactive mode
python scripts/audit_schedule_optimizer.py --interactive

# JSON output for integration
python scripts/audit_schedule_optimizer.py --processes processes.json --output json

Generates risk-based audit schedule considering:


  • Process risk level

  • Previous findings

  • Days since last audit

  • Criticality scores

Output includes:


  • Prioritized audit schedule

  • Quarterly distribution

  • Overdue audit alerts

  • Resource recommendations

Sample Process Input

{
  "processes": [
    {
      "name": "Design Control",
      "iso_clause": "7.3",
      "risk_level": "HIGH",
      "last_audit_date": "2024-06-15",
      "previous_findings": 2
    },
    {
      "name": "Document Control",
      "iso_clause": "4.2",
      "risk_level": "MEDIUM",
      "last_audit_date": "2024-09-01",
      "previous_findings": 0
    }
  ]
}

---

Audit Program Metrics

Track audit program effectiveness:

| Metric | Target | Measurement |
|--------|--------|-------------|
| Schedule compliance | >90% | Audits completed on time |
| Finding closure rate | >95% | Findings closed by due date |
| Repeat findings | <10% | Same finding in consecutive audits |
| CAPA effectiveness | >90% | Verified effective at follow-up |
| Auditor utilization | 4 days/month | Audit days per qualified auditor |

SKILL.md source

---
name: qms-audit-expert
description: ISO 13485 internal audit expertise for medical device QMS. Covers audit planning, execution, nonconformity classification, and CAPA verification. Use for internal audit planning, audit execution, f...
---

# QMS Audit Expert

ISO 13485 internal audit methodology for medical device quality management systems.

---

## Table of Contents

- [Audit Planning Workflow](#audit-planning-workflow)
- [Audit Execution](#audit-execution)
- [Nonconformity Management](#nonconformity-management)
- [External Audit Preparation](#external-audit-preparation)
- [Reference Documentation](#reference-documentation)
- [Tools](#tools)

---

## Audit Planning Workflow

Plan risk-based internal audit program:

1. List all QMS processes requiring audit
2. Assign risk level to each process (High/Medium/Low)
3. Review previous audit findings and trends
4. Determine audit frequency by risk level
5. Assign qualified auditors (verify independence)
6. Create annual audit schedule
7. Communicate schedule to process owners
8. **Validation:** All ISO 13485 clauses covered within cycle

### Risk-Based Audit Frequency

| Risk Level | Frequency | Criteria |
|------------|-----------|----------|
| High | Quarterly | Design control, CAPA, production validation |
| Medium | Semi-annual | Purchasing, training, document control |
| Low | Annual | Infrastructure, management review (if stable) |

### Audit Scope by Clause

| Clause | Process | Focus Areas |
|--------|---------|-------------|
| 4.2 | Document Control | Document approval, distribution, obsolete control |
| 5.6 | Management Review | Inputs complete, decisions documented, actions tracked |
| 6.2 | Training | Competency defined, records complete, effectiveness verified |
| 7.3 | Design Control | Inputs, reviews, V&V, transfer, changes |
| 7.4 | Purchasing | Supplier evaluation, incoming inspection |
| 7.5 | Production | Work instructions, process validation, DHR |
| 7.6 | Calibration | Equipment list, calibration status, out-of-tolerance |
| 8.2.2 | Internal Audit | Schedule compliance, auditor independence |
| 8.3 | NC Product | Identification, segregation, disposition |
| 8.5 | CAPA | Root cause, implementation, effectiveness |

### Auditor Independence

Verify auditor independence before assignment:

- [ ] Auditor not responsible for area being audited
- [ ] No direct reporting relationship to auditee
- [ ] Not involved in recent activities under audit
- [ ] Documented qualification for audit scope

---

## Audit Execution

Conduct systematic internal audit:

1. Prepare audit plan (scope, criteria, schedule)
2. Review relevant documentation before audit
3. Conduct opening meeting with auditee
4. Collect evidence (records, interviews, observation)
5. Classify findings (Major/Minor/Observation)
6. Conduct closing meeting with preliminary findings
7. Prepare audit report within 5 business days
8. **Validation:** All scope items covered, findings supported by evidence

### Evidence Collection

| Method | Use For | Documentation |
|--------|---------|---------------|
| Document review | Procedures, records | Document number, version, date |
| Interview | Process understanding | Interviewee name, role, summary |
| Observation | Actual practice | What, where, when observed |
| Record trace | Process flow | Record IDs, dates, linkage |

### Audit Questions by Clause

**Document Control (4.2):**
- Show me the document master list
- How do you control obsolete documents?
- Show me evidence of document change approval

**Design Control (7.3):**
- Show me the Design History File for [product]
- Who participates in design reviews?
- Show me design input to output traceability

**CAPA (8.5):**
- Show me the CAPA log with open items
- How do you determine root cause?
- Show me effectiveness verification records

See `references/iso13485-audit-guide.md` for complete question sets.

### Finding Documentation

Document each finding with:

```
Requirement: [Specific ISO 13485 clause or procedure]
Evidence: [What was observed, reviewed, or heard]
Gap: [How evidence fails to meet requirement]
```

**Example:**
```
Requirement: ISO 13485:2016 Clause 7.6 requires calibration
at specified intervals.

Evidence: Calibration records for pH meter (EQ-042) show
last calibration 2024-01-15. Calibration interval is
12 months. Today is 2025-03-20.

Gap: Equipment is 2 months overdue for calibration,
representing a gap in calibration program execution.
```

---

## Nonconformity Management

Classify and manage audit findings:

1. Evaluate finding against classification criteria
2. Assign severity (Major/Minor/Observation)
3. Document finding with objective evidence
4. Communicate to process owner
5. Initiate CAPA for Major/Minor findings
6. Track to closure
7. Verify effectiveness at follow-up
8. **Validation:** Finding closed only after effective CAPA

### Classification Criteria

| Category | Definition | CAPA Required | Timeline |
|----------|------------|---------------|----------|
| Major | Systematic failure or absence of element | Yes | 30 days |
| Minor | Isolated lapse or partial implementation | Recommended | 60 days |
| Observation | Improvement opportunity | Optional | As appropriate |

### Classification Decision

```
Is required element absent or failed?
├── Yes → Systematic (multiple instances)? → MAJOR
│   └── No → Could affect product safety? → MAJOR
│       └── No → MINOR
└── No → Deviation from procedure?
    ├── Yes → Recurring? → MAJOR
    │   └── No → MINOR
    └── No → Improvement opportunity? → OBSERVATION
```

### CAPA Integration

| Finding Severity | CAPA Depth | Verification |
|------------------|------------|--------------|
| Major | Full root cause analysis (5-Why, Fishbone) | Next audit or within 6 months |
| Minor | Immediate cause identification | Next scheduled audit |
| Observation | Not required | Noted at next audit |

See `references/nonconformity-classification.md` for detailed guidance.

---

## External Audit Preparation

Prepare for certification body or regulatory audit:

1. Complete all scheduled internal audits
2. Verify all findings closed with effective CAPA
3. Review documentation for currency and accuracy
4. Conduct management review with audit as input
5. Prepare facility and personnel
6. Conduct mock audit (full scope)
7. Brief personnel on audit protocol
8. **Validation:** Mock audit findings addressed before external audit

### Pre-Audit Readiness Checklist

**Documentation:**
- [ ] Quality Manual current
- [ ] Procedures reflect actual practice
- [ ] Records complete and retrievable
- [ ] Previous audit findings closed

**Personnel:**
- [ ] Key personnel available during audit
- [ ] Subject matter experts identified
- [ ] Personnel briefed on audit protocol
- [ ] Escorts assigned

**Facility:**
- [ ] Work areas organized
- [ ] Documents at point of use current
- [ ] Equipment calibration status visible
- [ ] Nonconforming product segregated

### Mock Audit Protocol

1. Use external auditor or qualified internal auditor
2. Cover full scope of upcoming external audit
3. Simulate actual audit conditions (timing, formality)
4. Document findings as for real audit
5. Address all Major and Minor findings before external audit
6. Brief management on readiness status

---

## Reference Documentation

### ISO 13485 Audit Guide

`references/iso13485-audit-guide.md` contains:

- Clause-by-clause audit methodology
- Sample audit questions for each clause
- Evidence collection requirements
- Common nonconformities by clause
- Finding severity classification

### Nonconformity Classification

`references/nonconformity-classification.md` contains:

- Severity classification criteria and decision tree
- Impact vs. occurrence matrix
- CAPA integration requirements
- Finding documentation templates
- Closure requirements by severity

---

## Tools

### Audit Schedule Optimizer

```bash
# Generate optimized audit schedule
python scripts/audit_schedule_optimizer.py --processes processes.json

# Interactive mode
python scripts/audit_schedule_optimizer.py --interactive

# JSON output for integration
python scripts/audit_schedule_optimizer.py --processes processes.json --output json
```

Generates risk-based audit schedule considering:
- Process risk level
- Previous findings
- Days since last audit
- Criticality scores

**Output includes:**
- Prioritized audit schedule
- Quarterly distribution
- Overdue audit alerts
- Resource recommendations

### Sample Process Input

```json
{
  "processes": [
    {
      "name": "Design Control",
      "iso_clause": "7.3",
      "risk_level": "HIGH",
      "last_audit_date": "2024-06-15",
      "previous_findings": 2
    },
    {
      "name": "Document Control",
      "iso_clause": "4.2",
      "risk_level": "MEDIUM",
      "last_audit_date": "2024-09-01",
      "previous_findings": 0
    }
  ]
}
```

---

## Audit Program Metrics

Track audit program effectiveness:

| Metric | Target | Measurement |
|--------|--------|-------------|
| Schedule compliance | >90% | Audits completed on time |
| Finding closure rate | >95% | Findings closed by due date |
| Repeat findings | <10% | Same finding in consecutive audits |
| CAPA effectiveness | >90% | Verified effective at follow-up |
| Auditor utilization | 4 days/month | Audit days per qualified auditor |

Related skills 6

agent-browser

★ Featured Official

Browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, including navigating pages, filling forms, clicking buttons, taking screenshots, extracting data, testing web apps, or automating any browser task. Triggers include requests to "open a website", "fill out a form", "click a button", "take a screenshot", "scrape data from a page", "test this web app", "login to a site", "automate browser actions", or any task requiring programmatic web interaction. Also use...

vercel-labs 297k
Testing & Quality

grill-me

★ Featured

Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".

mattpocock 192k
Testing & Quality

grill-with-docs

★ Featured

Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates documentation (CONTEXT.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallise. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan against their project's language and documented decisions.

mattpocock 138k
Testing & Quality

minimal-run-and-audit

★ Featured

RigorPilot trusted execution and reporting skill for README-first deep learning repo reproduction. Use when the task is specifically to capture or normalize evidence from the selected smoke test or documented inference or evaluation command and write standardized `repro_outputs/` files, including patch notes when repository files changed. Do not use for training execution, initial repo intake, generic environment setup, paper lookup, target selection, hidden scientific-meaning changes, or end...

lllllllama 127k
Testing & Quality

polish

★ Featured

Performs a final quality pass fixing alignment, spacing, consistency, and micro-detail issues before shipping. Use when the user mentions polish, finishing touches, pre-launch review, something looks off, or wants to go from good to great.

pbakaus 86k
Testing & Quality

critique

★ Featured

Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, automated anti-pattern detection, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.

pbakaus 83k
Testing & Quality