Multi Perspective Critique
Multi-perspective review system using Multi-Agent Debate and LLM-as-Judge patterns with 3 specialized judges, debate rounds, and consensus building
Install
Quick install
npx skills add https://github.com/NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit/tree/master/plugins/reflexion/skills/critiquenpx skills add NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit --skill "Multi-Perspective Critique" --agent claude-codenpx skills add NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit --skill "Multi-Perspective Critique" --agent cursornpx skills add NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit --skill "Multi-Perspective Critique" --agent codexnpx skills add NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit --skill "Multi-Perspective Critique" --agent opencodenpx skills add NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit --skill "Multi-Perspective Critique" --agent github-copilotnpx skills add NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit --skill "Multi-Perspective Critique" --agent windsurfMore install options
Shorthand — useful for multi-skill repos:
npx skills add NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit --skill "Multi-Perspective Critique"Manual — clone the repo and drop the folder into your agent's skills directory:
git clone https://github.com/NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit.gitcp -r context-engineering-kit/plugins/reflexion/skills/critique ~/.claude/skills/Multi-Perspective Critique
Multi-perspective review system using Multi-Agent Debate and LLM-as-Judge patterns with 3 specialized judges, debate rounds, and consensus building
What is it?
Multi-perspective review system using Multi-Agent Debate and LLM-as-Judge patterns with 3 specialized judges, debate rounds, and consensus building Built for use cases involving critique, multi-agent-debate, llm-as-judge, quality-review, consensus.
How to use it?
``Key Features
- Multi-perspective review system using Multi-Agent Debate and LLM-as-Judge patterns with 3 specialized judges, debate rounds, and consensus building
- Seamless integration with Claude's development workflow
- Comprehensive guidelines and best practices for multi-perspective critiqueView on GitHub
GitHub Stats
StarsForksLast UpdateAuthorNeoLabHQLicenseGPL-3.0Version1.0.0Categories
AI & MLDeveloper ToolsTags
critiquemulti-agent-debatellm-as-judgequality-reviewconsensusFeatures
Related Skills
More from AI & MLAgent Evaluation Framework
Comprehensive Claude Code agent evaluation framework with multi-dimensional scoring, LLM-as-Judge mode, and research-backed performance variance analysis433NeoLabHQAI & MLDeveloper Tools00
Execute and Judge Loop
Single-task execution with LLM-as-Judge verification in an iterative loop, supporting auto-retry and strict orchestrator role separation433NeoLabHQAI & MLDeveloper Tools00
LLM-as-Judge Evaluator
Standalone LLM-as-Judge evaluation tool with context isolation, Chain-of-Thought scoring, multi-dimensional weighted rubric, and evidence-backed assessments433NeoLabHQAI & MLDeveloper Tools00
---
Source: https://github.com/NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit/tree/master/plugins/reflexion/skills/critique
Author: NeoLabHQ
License: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.html
GitHub Stars: 433
Tags: critique, multi-agent-debate, llm-as-judge, quality-review, consensus
SKILL.md source
--- name: Multi-Perspective Critique description: Multi-perspective review system using Multi-Agent Debate and LLM-as-Judge patterns with 3 specialized judges, debate rounds, and consensus building --- # Multi-Perspective Critique Multi-perspective review system using Multi-Agent Debate and LLM-as-Judge patterns with 3 specialized judges, debate rounds, and consensus building What is it? Multi-perspective review system using Multi-Agent Debate and LLM-as-Judge patterns with 3 specialized judges, debate rounds, and consensus building Built for use cases involving critique, multi-agent-debate, llm-as-judge, quality-review, consensus. ## How to use it? ``` `` ``` ## Key Features * Multi-perspective review system using Multi-Agent Debate and LLM-as-Judge patterns with 3 specialized judges, debate rounds, and consensus building * Seamless integration with Claude's development workflow * Comprehensive guidelines and best practices for multi-perspective critiqueView on GitHub ### GitHub Stats StarsForksLast UpdateAuthorNeoLabHQLicenseGPL-3.0Version1.0.0 ### Categories AI & MLDeveloper Tools ### Tags critiquemulti-agent-debatellm-as-judgequality-reviewconsensus ### Features ## Related Skills More from AI & ML ### Agent Evaluation Framework Comprehensive Claude Code agent evaluation framework with multi-dimensional scoring, LLM-as-Judge mode, and research-backed performance variance analysis 433NeoLabHQAI & MLDeveloper Tools00 ### Execute and Judge Loop Single-task execution with LLM-as-Judge verification in an iterative loop, supporting auto-retry and strict orchestrator role separation 433NeoLabHQAI & MLDeveloper Tools00 ### LLM-as-Judge Evaluator Standalone LLM-as-Judge evaluation tool with context isolation, Chain-of-Thought scoring, multi-dimensional weighted rubric, and evidence-backed assessments 433NeoLabHQAI & MLDeveloper Tools00 --- **Source**: https://github.com/NeoLabHQ/context-engineering-kit/tree/master/plugins/reflexion/skills/critique **Author**: NeoLabHQ **License**: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.html **GitHub Stars**: 433 **Tags**: critique, multi-agent-debate, llm-as-judge, quality-review, consensus
Related skills 6
to-prd
Turn the current conversation context into a PRD and publish it to the project issue tracker. Use when user wants to create a PRD from the current context.
to-issues
Break a plan, spec, or PRD into independently-grabbable issues on the project issue tracker using tracer-bullet vertical slices. Use when user wants to convert a plan into issues, create implementation tickets, or break down work into issues.
Boardroom
/cs:boardroom <brief> — 6-phase multi-role deliberation across the C-suite with Phase 2 isolation, critic pre-screen, and synthesis. Outputs a board memo.
Brief
/cs:brief <topic> — Generate a one-page strategy brief from an office-hours intake. First step in the strategic sprint pipeline.
C Level Agents
Founder-mode executive team. 8 cs-* C-suite agents (CFO, CMO, CRO, CPO, COO, CHRO, CISO, Chief of Staff) and 17 /cs:* slash commands for forcing-question office hours, multi-role boardroom delibera...
Caio Review
/cs:caio-review <plan> — Eval-demanding Chief AI Officer interrogation of any plan that involves AI: model selection, risk classification, cost economics, or AI hiring.