NEW Browse AI tools across categories — updated daily. See what's new →

Review Implementing

Evaluate code implementation plans and align with specs

Version1.0.0
LicenseApache-2.0
Token count~508
UpdatedJun 5, 2026

Install

Quick install

via npx skills · works with 57+ agents
npx skills add https://github.com/mhattingpete/claude-skills-marketplace/tree/main/engineering-workflow-plugin/skills/review-implementing
Or pick agent:
npx skills add mhattingpete/claude-skills-marketplace --skill review-implementing --agent claude-code
npx skills add mhattingpete/claude-skills-marketplace --skill review-implementing --agent cursor
npx skills add mhattingpete/claude-skills-marketplace --skill review-implementing --agent codex
npx skills add mhattingpete/claude-skills-marketplace --skill review-implementing --agent opencode
npx skills add mhattingpete/claude-skills-marketplace --skill review-implementing --agent github-copilot
npx skills add mhattingpete/claude-skills-marketplace --skill review-implementing --agent windsurf
More install options

Shorthand — useful for multi-skill repos:

npx skills add mhattingpete/claude-skills-marketplace --skill review-implementing

Manual — clone the repo and drop the folder into your agent's skills directory:

git clone https://github.com/mhattingpete/claude-skills-marketplace.git
cp -r claude-skills-marketplace/engineering-workflow-plugin/skills/review-implementing ~/.claude/skills/
How to use: Once installed, ask your agent to "use the review-implementing skill" or describe what you want (e.g. "Evaluate code implementation plans and align with specs"). Requires Node.js 18+.

review-implementing

Evaluate code implementation plans and align with specs

What is it?
A code review skill that evaluates implementation plans against specifications and requirements. It systematically checks whether code changes align with the original design, identifies gaps between the plan and implementation, and suggests corrections. Designed for quality assurance in software development workflows.

How to use it?

After implementing code changes, invoke this skill to:
  • Compare the implementation against the original plan or specification
  • Identify gaps where the code diverges from requirements
  • Check for missing edge cases, error handling, or test coverage
  • Suggest corrections and improvements to align with the spec

The skill provides structured feedback with specific file and line references.

Key Features

  • Systematic comparison of implementation against specifications
  • Gap analysis between planned and actual code changes
  • Edge case and error handling verification
  • Test coverage assessment against requirements
  • Structured feedback with specific code referencesView on GitHub

GitHub Stats

StarsForksLast UpdateAuthormhattingpeteLicenseApache-2.0Version1.0.0

Categories

Developer ToolsProductivity

Tags

automationtestinggitcodingproductivity

Features

Related Skills

More from Developer Tools

git-pushing

Automate git operations and repository interactions

350mhattingpeteDeveloper ToolsProductivity00

test-fixing

Detect failing tests and propose patches or fixes

350mhattingpeteDeveloper ToolsProductivity00

n8n Workflow Skills

Enables AI assistants to directly understand and operate n8n workflows

194haunchenDeveloper ToolsProductivity00

---

Source: https://github.com/mhattingpete/claude-skills-marketplace/tree/main/engineering-workflow-plugin/skills/review-implementing
Author: mhattingpete
License: https://opensource.org/licenses/Apache-2.0
GitHub Stars: 350
Tags: automation, testing, git, coding, productivity

SKILL.md source

---
name: review-implementing
description: Evaluate code implementation plans and align with specs
---

# review-implementing

Evaluate code implementation plans and align with specs

What is it?
A code review skill that evaluates implementation plans against specifications and requirements. It systematically checks whether code changes align with the original design, identifies gaps between the plan and implementation, and suggests corrections. Designed for quality assurance in software development workflows.

## How to use it?
After implementing code changes, invoke this skill to:

* Compare the implementation against the original plan or specification

* Identify gaps where the code diverges from requirements

* Check for missing edge cases, error handling, or test coverage

* Suggest corrections and improvements to align with the spec

The skill provides structured feedback with specific file and line references.

## Key Features

* Systematic comparison of implementation against specifications
* Gap analysis between planned and actual code changes
* Edge case and error handling verification
* Test coverage assessment against requirements
* Structured feedback with specific code referencesView on GitHub

### GitHub Stats
StarsForksLast UpdateAuthormhattingpeteLicenseApache-2.0Version1.0.0

### Categories
Developer ToolsProductivity

### Tags
automationtestinggitcodingproductivity

### Features

## Related Skills
More from Developer Tools

### git-pushing
Automate git operations and repository interactions

350mhattingpeteDeveloper ToolsProductivity00

### test-fixing
Detect failing tests and propose patches or fixes

350mhattingpeteDeveloper ToolsProductivity00

### n8n Workflow Skills
Enables AI assistants to directly understand and operate n8n workflows

194haunchenDeveloper ToolsProductivity00

---

**Source**: https://github.com/mhattingpete/claude-skills-marketplace/tree/main/engineering-workflow-plugin/skills/review-implementing
**Author**: mhattingpete
**License**: https://opensource.org/licenses/Apache-2.0
**GitHub Stars**: 350
**Tags**: automation, testing, git, coding, productivity

Related skills 6

agent-browser

★ Featured Official

Browser automation CLI for AI agents. Use when the user needs to interact with websites, including navigating pages, filling forms, clicking buttons, taking screenshots, extracting data, testing web apps, or automating any browser task. Triggers include requests to "open a website", "fill out a form", "click a button", "take a screenshot", "scrape data from a page", "test this web app", "login to a site", "automate browser actions", or any task requiring programmatic web interaction. Also use...

vercel-labs 297k
Testing & Quality

grill-me

★ Featured

Interview the user relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan, get grilled on their design, or mentions "grill me".

mattpocock 192k
Testing & Quality

grill-with-docs

★ Featured

Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates documentation (CONTEXT.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallise. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan against their project's language and documented decisions.

mattpocock 138k
Testing & Quality

minimal-run-and-audit

★ Featured

RigorPilot trusted execution and reporting skill for README-first deep learning repo reproduction. Use when the task is specifically to capture or normalize evidence from the selected smoke test or documented inference or evaluation command and write standardized `repro_outputs/` files, including patch notes when repository files changed. Do not use for training execution, initial repo intake, generic environment setup, paper lookup, target selection, hidden scientific-meaning changes, or end...

lllllllama 127k
Testing & Quality

polish

★ Featured

Performs a final quality pass fixing alignment, spacing, consistency, and micro-detail issues before shipping. Use when the user mentions polish, finishing touches, pre-launch review, something looks off, or wants to go from good to great.

pbakaus 86k
Testing & Quality

critique

★ Featured

Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, automated anti-pattern detection, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.

pbakaus 83k
Testing & Quality