NEW Browse AI tools across categories — updated daily. See what's new →

Agent Evaluation

Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world ben...

Authordavila7
Version1.0.0
LicenseMIT
Token count~519
UpdatedMay 27, 2026

Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world benchmarks Use when: agent testing, agent evaluation, benchmark agents, agent reliability, test agent.

Install

Quick install

via npx skills · works with 57+ agents
npx skills add https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates/tree/main/cli-tool/components/skills/ai-research/agent-evaluation
Or pick agent:
npx skills add davila7/claude-code-templates --skill agent-evaluation --agent claude-code
npx skills add davila7/claude-code-templates --skill agent-evaluation --agent cursor
npx skills add davila7/claude-code-templates --skill agent-evaluation --agent codex
npx skills add davila7/claude-code-templates --skill agent-evaluation --agent opencode
npx skills add davila7/claude-code-templates --skill agent-evaluation --agent github-copilot
npx skills add davila7/claude-code-templates --skill agent-evaluation --agent windsurf
More install options

Shorthand — useful for multi-skill repos:

npx skills add davila7/claude-code-templates --skill agent-evaluation

Manual — clone the repo and drop the folder into your agent's skills directory:

git clone https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates.git
cp -r claude-code-templates/cli-tool/components/skills/ai-research/agent-evaluation ~/.claude/skills/
How to use: Once installed, ask your agent to "use the agent-evaluation skill" or describe what you want (e.g. "Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability ass"). Requires Node.js 18+.

Agent Evaluation

You're a quality engineer who has seen agents that aced benchmarks fail spectacularly in
production. You've learned that evaluating LLM agents is fundamentally different from
testing traditional software—the same input can produce different outputs, and "correct"
often has no single answer.

You've built evaluation frameworks that catch issues before production: behavioral regression
tests, capability assessments, and reliability metrics. You understand that the goal isn't
100% test pass rate—it

Capabilities

  • agent-testing
  • benchmark-design
  • capability-assessment
  • reliability-metrics
  • regression-testing

Requirements

  • testing-fundamentals
  • llm-fundamentals

Patterns

Statistical Test Evaluation

Run tests multiple times and analyze result distributions

Behavioral Contract Testing

Define and test agent behavioral invariants

Adversarial Testing

Actively try to break agent behavior

Anti-Patterns

❌ Single-Run Testing

❌ Only Happy Path Tests

❌ Output String Matching

⚠️ Sharp Edges

| Issue | Severity | Solution |
|-------|----------|----------|
| Agent scores well on benchmarks but fails in production | high | // Bridge benchmark and production evaluation |
| Same test passes sometimes, fails other times | high | // Handle flaky tests in LLM agent evaluation |
| Agent optimized for metric, not actual task | medium | // Multi-dimensional evaluation to prevent gaming |
| Test data accidentally used in training or prompts | critical | // Prevent data leakage in agent evaluation |

Related Skills

Works well with: multi-agent-orchestration, agent-communication, autonomous-agents

SKILL.md source

---
name: agent-evaluation
description: Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world ben...
---

# Agent Evaluation

You're a quality engineer who has seen agents that aced benchmarks fail spectacularly in
production. You've learned that evaluating LLM agents is fundamentally different from
testing traditional software—the same input can produce different outputs, and "correct"
often has no single answer.

You've built evaluation frameworks that catch issues before production: behavioral regression
tests, capability assessments, and reliability metrics. You understand that the goal isn't
100% test pass rate—it

## Capabilities

- agent-testing
- benchmark-design
- capability-assessment
- reliability-metrics
- regression-testing

## Requirements

- testing-fundamentals
- llm-fundamentals

## Patterns

### Statistical Test Evaluation

Run tests multiple times and analyze result distributions

### Behavioral Contract Testing

Define and test agent behavioral invariants

### Adversarial Testing

Actively try to break agent behavior

## Anti-Patterns

### ❌ Single-Run Testing

### ❌ Only Happy Path Tests

### ❌ Output String Matching

## ⚠️ Sharp Edges

| Issue | Severity | Solution |
|-------|----------|----------|
| Agent scores well on benchmarks but fails in production | high | // Bridge benchmark and production evaluation |
| Same test passes sometimes, fails other times | high | // Handle flaky tests in LLM agent evaluation |
| Agent optimized for metric, not actual task | medium | // Multi-dimensional evaluation to prevent gaming |
| Test data accidentally used in training or prompts | critical | // Prevent data leakage in agent evaluation |

## Related Skills

Works well with: `multi-agent-orchestration`, `agent-communication`, `autonomous-agents`

Related skills 6

caveman

★ Featured

Ultra-compressed communication mode. Cuts token usage ~75% by speaking like caveman while keeping full technical accuracy. Supports intensity levels: lite, full (default), ultra, wenyan-lite, wenyan-full, wenyan-ultra. Use when user says "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "use caveman", "less tokens", "be brief", or invokes /caveman. Also auto-triggers when token efficiency is requested.

juliusbrussee 167k
Development

secure-linux-web-hosting

★ Featured

Use when setting up, hardening, or reviewing a cloud server for self-hosting, including DNS, SSH, firewalls, Nginx, static-site hosting, reverse-proxying an app, HTTPS with Let's Encrypt or ACME clients, safe HTTP-to-HTTPS redirects, or optional post-launch network tuning such as BBR.

xixu-me 155k
Development

readme-i18n

★ Featured

Use when the user wants to translate a repository README, make a repo multilingual, localize docs, add a language switcher, internationalize the README, or update localized README variants in a GitHub-style repository.

xixu-me 155k
Development

lark-shared

★ Featured

Use when first setting up lark-cli, running auth login, switching user/bot identity (--as), handling permission denied or scope errors, needing to update lark-cli, or seeing _notice in JSON output.

larksuite 155k
Development

improve-codebase-architecture

★ Featured

Find deepening opportunities in a codebase, informed by the domain language in CONTEXT.md and the decisions in docs/adr/. Use when the user wants to improve architecture, find refactoring opportunities, consolidate tightly-coupled modules, or make a codebase more testable and AI-navigable.

mattpocock 151k
Development

paper-context-resolver

★ Featured

Optional RigorPilot helper for README-first deep learning repo reproduction. Use only when the README and repository files leave a narrow reproduction-critical gap and the task is to resolve a specific paper detail such as dataset split, preprocessing, evaluation protocol, checkpoint mapping, or runtime assumption from primary paper sources while recording conflicts. Do not use for general paper summary, repo scanning, environment setup, command execution, title-only paper lookup, or replacin...

lllllllama 127k
Development