Agent Evaluation
Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world ben...
Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world benchmarks Use when: agent testing, agent evaluation, benchmark agents, agent reliability, test agent.
Install
Quick install
npx skills add https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates/tree/main/cli-tool/components/skills/ai-research/agent-evaluationnpx skills add davila7/claude-code-templates --skill agent-evaluation --agent claude-codenpx skills add davila7/claude-code-templates --skill agent-evaluation --agent cursornpx skills add davila7/claude-code-templates --skill agent-evaluation --agent codexnpx skills add davila7/claude-code-templates --skill agent-evaluation --agent opencodenpx skills add davila7/claude-code-templates --skill agent-evaluation --agent github-copilotnpx skills add davila7/claude-code-templates --skill agent-evaluation --agent windsurfMore install options
Shorthand — useful for multi-skill repos:
npx skills add davila7/claude-code-templates --skill agent-evaluationManual — clone the repo and drop the folder into your agent's skills directory:
git clone https://github.com/davila7/claude-code-templates.gitcp -r claude-code-templates/cli-tool/components/skills/ai-research/agent-evaluation ~/.claude/skills/Agent Evaluation
You're a quality engineer who has seen agents that aced benchmarks fail spectacularly in
production. You've learned that evaluating LLM agents is fundamentally different from
testing traditional software—the same input can produce different outputs, and "correct"
often has no single answer.
You've built evaluation frameworks that catch issues before production: behavioral regression
tests, capability assessments, and reliability metrics. You understand that the goal isn't
100% test pass rate—it
Capabilities
- agent-testing
- benchmark-design
- capability-assessment
- reliability-metrics
- regression-testing
Requirements
- testing-fundamentals
- llm-fundamentals
Patterns
Statistical Test Evaluation
Run tests multiple times and analyze result distributions
Behavioral Contract Testing
Define and test agent behavioral invariants
Adversarial Testing
Actively try to break agent behavior
Anti-Patterns
❌ Single-Run Testing
❌ Only Happy Path Tests
❌ Output String Matching
⚠️ Sharp Edges
| Issue | Severity | Solution |
|-------|----------|----------|
| Agent scores well on benchmarks but fails in production | high | // Bridge benchmark and production evaluation |
| Same test passes sometimes, fails other times | high | // Handle flaky tests in LLM agent evaluation |
| Agent optimized for metric, not actual task | medium | // Multi-dimensional evaluation to prevent gaming |
| Test data accidentally used in training or prompts | critical | // Prevent data leakage in agent evaluation |
Related Skills
Works well with: multi-agent-orchestration, agent-communication, autonomous-agents
SKILL.md source
--- name: agent-evaluation description: Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world ben... --- # Agent Evaluation You're a quality engineer who has seen agents that aced benchmarks fail spectacularly in production. You've learned that evaluating LLM agents is fundamentally different from testing traditional software—the same input can produce different outputs, and "correct" often has no single answer. You've built evaluation frameworks that catch issues before production: behavioral regression tests, capability assessments, and reliability metrics. You understand that the goal isn't 100% test pass rate—it ## Capabilities - agent-testing - benchmark-design - capability-assessment - reliability-metrics - regression-testing ## Requirements - testing-fundamentals - llm-fundamentals ## Patterns ### Statistical Test Evaluation Run tests multiple times and analyze result distributions ### Behavioral Contract Testing Define and test agent behavioral invariants ### Adversarial Testing Actively try to break agent behavior ## Anti-Patterns ### ❌ Single-Run Testing ### ❌ Only Happy Path Tests ### ❌ Output String Matching ## ⚠️ Sharp Edges | Issue | Severity | Solution | |-------|----------|----------| | Agent scores well on benchmarks but fails in production | high | // Bridge benchmark and production evaluation | | Same test passes sometimes, fails other times | high | // Handle flaky tests in LLM agent evaluation | | Agent optimized for metric, not actual task | medium | // Multi-dimensional evaluation to prevent gaming | | Test data accidentally used in training or prompts | critical | // Prevent data leakage in agent evaluation | ## Related Skills Works well with: `multi-agent-orchestration`, `agent-communication`, `autonomous-agents`
Related skills 6
caveman
Ultra-compressed communication mode. Cuts token usage ~75% by speaking like caveman while keeping full technical accuracy. Supports intensity levels: lite, full (default), ultra, wenyan-lite, wenyan-full, wenyan-ultra. Use when user says "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "use caveman", "less tokens", "be brief", or invokes /caveman. Also auto-triggers when token efficiency is requested.
secure-linux-web-hosting
Use when setting up, hardening, or reviewing a cloud server for self-hosting, including DNS, SSH, firewalls, Nginx, static-site hosting, reverse-proxying an app, HTTPS with Let's Encrypt or ACME clients, safe HTTP-to-HTTPS redirects, or optional post-launch network tuning such as BBR.
readme-i18n
Use when the user wants to translate a repository README, make a repo multilingual, localize docs, add a language switcher, internationalize the README, or update localized README variants in a GitHub-style repository.
lark-shared
Use when first setting up lark-cli, running auth login, switching user/bot identity (--as), handling permission denied or scope errors, needing to update lark-cli, or seeing _notice in JSON output.
improve-codebase-architecture
Find deepening opportunities in a codebase, informed by the domain language in CONTEXT.md and the decisions in docs/adr/. Use when the user wants to improve architecture, find refactoring opportunities, consolidate tightly-coupled modules, or make a codebase more testable and AI-navigable.
paper-context-resolver
Optional RigorPilot helper for README-first deep learning repo reproduction. Use only when the README and repository files leave a narrow reproduction-critical gap and the task is to resolve a specific paper detail such as dataset split, preprocessing, evaluation protocol, checkpoint mapping, or runtime assumption from primary paper sources while recording conflicts. Do not use for general paper summary, repo scanning, environment setup, command execution, title-only paper lookup, or replacin...